Supply Chain Management Process of Starbucks

Starbucks Commits to a Resource-Positive Future, Giving More than ...

More and more companies are concentrating on creating a sustainable supply chain process in their operation network and using the resources to its maximum capacity. A growth of conscious consumers has further facilitated this process as more and more consumers want companies to lay stress on environmental and sustainable factors. The actual transformation occurred in the year 2008 and the main approach used by the company was the integration of various processes that allowed them to achieve a long term profit. These processed were social, environmental and economic process whereby Starbucks could develop a proper SSCM network (Craig R. Carter, 2008).

The Findings

After recognizing and evaluation the current supply chain which Starbucks had at that point of time, the Senior Vice President Gibbons found out that more than half of the delivery of raw material to the store were arriving late. Gibbons visited several Starbucks store himself and analyzed that the employees were not paying much attention to when and how the raw materials arrived. Thus there was clearly room for improvement. He also analyzed the cost process and recognized that the main factor for cost inflation was the involvement of third-party logistics. Starbucks outsourced almost 65% of its ingredients in order to speed up the operations process. But in doing so, the agreements, contracts, transport cost were causing delays and cost inflation of the products (Volk, 2017). Based on this, Gibbons suggested a three-step supply chain process. The first part involved simplifying the process involved, the second involved improving its day to day supply operations at various stores and the final part included defining the roles and responsibilities of the employees more clearly.

Operational Strategy and Macro Environment

Although the findings and the three-step plan were pretty direct, the design of each part of the process was extremely complicated according to Gibbons. He tried to simplify the entire process so that the whole system would fall into four basic structure; plan, source, make and deliver. For example, if an employee were to be involved in planning, he or she would be put under an umbrella of the planning group, which would involve planning as a whole; be its production planning, recipe planning or packaging planning. The sourcing activities were grouped into two areas of ‘coffee’ and ‘non-coffee’. This was an easier and direct method understandable to all. Statistical data showed that Starbucks spent almost 600 million US Dollar on the sourcing of raw materials just for coffee. The ‘non-coffee’ sourcing amounted to 2.5 billion US Dollar annually(Donald Rhodes, 2015). All manufacturing items which involved making, be it in-house or contract-based were grouped into the ‘make’ sector. The last sector of ‘deliver’ included all employees in the logistics process and distribution of goods. These sectors were later transformed into departments so that defining employee roles would be easier.

The next important process of supply chain management was reducing costs and improving the inefficiencies existing in the stores. Thomas E. Johnsen et al(2018) mentions that the main responsibility of the sourcing group here was identifying the cost drivers. One of the major reasons identified were that no negotiation was occurring and the company was paying the demanded price to the suppliers, logistics and other departments. Apart from the static costs like shipping, agreement costs etc. the company started negotiating with suppliers regarding purchase and delivery. 

Farmer Support | Starbucks Coffee Company
A Map Depicting the Plantation of Starbucks

The manufacturing team at Starbucks also devised a more efficient model whereby they could deliver coffee beans to the processing plants in a timely manner. Starbucks opened processing plants in areas where the coffee originated. This was one of the critical processes that reduced time and cost and increased efficiency in a major way. According to Schönberger et al (2019) Starbucks already owned three coffee plants in the US, the fourth one in Columbia. Attempts and planning were made to open in other areas of Africa and Latin America, where it sourced its coffee from. Additionally, the company opened a plant in Amsterdam, the Netherlands for its coffee processing in Europe and also developed 24 new co-suppliers for various raw materials. In the cost analysis process, Gibbons saw identified that transportation, logistics and distribution made up the major part of the expense. The reason was inevitable because its coffee was sourced from various parts of the world like Ghana, Venezuela, Uruguay, China, the Middle East and other regions. This proved to be the most challenging part of Starbucks. Data indicated that per week Starbucks had almost 70,000 to 80,000 international delivery made mainly by sea shipment.

The solution here again was the introduction of a single logistics system, which would bring processed coffee beans from all over the world in sea shipments to Europe, UK and the US. From the port, the green beans would be transported to the storage sites which were then taken to roasting plants. After they were roasted, they were packed and transported to the distribution centres regionally. The distribution centres were managed by third-party companies, who delivered the products to the retail outlets. Contract rates of these third-party companies were reviewed and negotiated for better pricing. Clear cost metrics, production metrics and the service metrics were clearly outlined.

Coffee travels fast – Starbucks' supply chain | T1 2016 MPK732 ...

Sourcing Map of various products at Starbucks


Key Requirements, Capabilities and Challenges

In order to cope up with the above-mentioned strategies, Starbucks had to formulate certain key requirements which they needed to maintain at all cost. One of the areas that were mentioned earlier was the fact that the employees working at the retail store did not pay attention to when and how the raw materials arrived. This clearly proved a need for proper training. Although the training was provided to all employees, certain gaps were identified which made them lose interest in all parts of the process. To quote what Howard Schultz said, “these people are not only the heart and soul but also the public face of the company. Every dollar earned passes through their hands.” (Shultz, 1997).

The training of the employees was increased to being more than just a server at a retail store. They were encouraged to learn more about speciality coffees and their origin. Employee focus was directed to this by increasing the health care benefits of everyone who were working for 20 hours or more per week. By doing so, they not only attracted higher quality employees but also improved the turnover rate and the overall cost spent on the employees. CSR activities were also introduced at the various retail outlets. Various other plans like the Bean Stock were introduced, which would grant stock options to every employee, from top managers to servers (Scott A. Snell, 2017). Thus they achieved success in employee satisfaction.

The Starbucks Coffee Company - ppt download

The quality of coffee beans also had to be maintained as cost in logistics and deliveries were reduced. Starbucks bought about a social change in the suppliers by conducting tie-up with conservation organisations such as Conservation International. This strategic collaboration facilitated the establishment of CARE (Coffee and Farmer Equity Practices). This practice ensured farmers were treated ethically and had the chance to improve their life by offering high-quality coffee (Li Chen, 2019). Appropriate compensation was allotted to those according to the quality they provided.

The major challenges that were faced while improving the supply chain process were dealing with logistics and the distribution centres. The huge volume of their business proved to be quite tough to handle. The distribution centres alone were 200,000 to 300,000 square feet in size. Deliveries made per week were also 70,000 in numbers. The main areas of the challenge here were the product transition, the introduction of new products and the promotion of the same (Mason, et al., 2017). The training of the staffs hired also were huge in numbers and had to be done very crucially.

The Operation Management Strategies of Starbucks

Analysis and Evaluation

From the above discussion, it is clear that Starbucks developed many strategies which would improve their supply chain processes. These strategies were just only a part of other strategies that were incorporated along with the changing time. However, the most important factor that Starbucks developed in the minds of its customer is the feeling of community. Many scholars like Esteban et al(2019) state this feeling as the ‘third place’. This ‘third place’ was a representation of a corner or a place where customers could forget their daily routine and sit and relax with a quiet cup of coffee. The design analysis as mentioned earlier here is important as store designs were made keeping in mind this feeling of a special place. Other four Vs also contributed significantly as improved in the supply chain process automatically improved volume and dependability. Once the supply chain was managed, the marketing team could also concentrate on creating variation and flexibility strategies for the customers.

Other factors that further supported this concept of ‘third place’ was the increase of passive income opportunities and the availability of free Wi-Fi available at all their stores. Mobile computing devices with every individual also made access to the internet possible. This further added to the flexibility that they provided to the public in general (Craig Garthwaite, 2017). Other marketing strategies include allowing the customers to access iTunes playlist from their stores and a full two hour of internet access to the loyalty members on busy days. On non-busy days the hours could be increased.

Starbucks Future Includes More Mobile, More Food, More China, and ...

Starbucks Future Includes More Mobile, More Food, More China, and More Veterans

Starbucks has surpassed its goal to hire 10,000 veterans and military

spouses by the 2018 deadline, and now plans to increase its hiring goal to

25,000 by 2025.

Recommendations

When considering the challenges mentioned earlier, the major recommendation here would be to break down the entire process into smaller sub-parts so that handling of the operations would be easier. The strategies created here laid the foundation of the entire process, but for the continuation of effective handling, sub-departments had to be introduced. The processes also had to maintain transparency in their operations and hence has to incorporate procedures so that the supply chain partners maintain transparency and reliability(Jee-Won Kang, 2017). Starbucks in their supply chain processes have been successful in curtailing costs without compromising the delivery and the service of the product. This means that in order to carry on such a success, the company must ensure that the organisation’s confidence is maintained(Yu, 2019). This will also enable the introduction of policies which can further improve their operational processes.

Conclusion

The supply chain management system in Starbucks uses several technologies which are essential for efficient management. High-quality digital technology with automated information system is integrated into all its retail stores as well in various distribution centres and processing plants(Tsanos, 2016). However, improving the processes requires a lot of change in strategy which brings about a change in the IT system. In this report, we have seen the various change strategies that were incorporated by Gibbons and Schultz. The operational activities in the entire processes enable timely delivery of goods, reduction in cost at various levels and improving the quality level and customer satisfaction. This also enabled for a better supplier and buyer relationship and introduction of ethical principles. We also see in this report how the 4 Vs, the performance objectives and others are interconnected with the supply chain process.




References

Admin, 2019. European Coffee Trips. [Online]
Available at: https://europeancoffeetrip.com/uk/
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Craig Garthwaite, M. B. J. B. G. M., 2017. Starbucks: A Story of Growth, s.l.: Kellogg School of Management Cases.

Craig R. Carter, D. S. R., 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), pp. 360-387.

Cumming, E., 2016. How Greggs conquered Britain: ‘Nobody can quite believe how well it has done’. [Online]
Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/global/2016/mar/05/greggs-conquered-britain-bakery-profit-sausage-rolls
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Davidson, L., 2015. Coffee shop kings: Brits prefer Greggs to Starbucks. [Online]
Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/11486257/Coffee-shop-kings-Brits-prefer-Greggs-to-Starbucks.html
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Donald Rhodes, M. J. D., 2015. Socially Responsible Supply Chain Management for a Competitive Advantage. New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 321-340.

Duggan, O., 2019. Does Greggs coffee taste better than Starbucks?. [Online]
Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/epic/grg/11006544/Does-Greggs-coffee-taste-better-than-Starbucks.html
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Esteban, K. A. L., 2019. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 207, pp. 1084-1098.

Greggs, 2019. Strategy in Action. [Online]
Available at: https://corporate.greggs.co.uk/strategy/strategy-in-action
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Jee-Won Kang, Y. N., 2017. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Equity and the Moderating Role of Ethical Consumerism: The Case of Starbucks. Sage Journals, 42(7), pp. 1130-1151.

Kline, D. B., 2016. Starbucks Gives In to Customer Demands. [Online]
Available at: https://www.fool.com/investing/2016/08/11/starbucks-gives-in-to-customer-demands.aspx
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Li Chen, H. L. L., 2019. Supply Chain Compliance. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 3448626, 1(1), pp. 6-10.

Mason, A., Cole, T. & Goza, N., 2017. STARBUCKS: A CASE STUDY OF EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT IN THE COFFEE INDUSTRY.. Journal of International Management Studies , 17(1), pp. 43-48.

NEWCOMB, A., 2015. Starbucks App Makes Waiting in Line For Coffee a Thing of the Past. [Online]
Available at: https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/starbucks-app-makes-waiting-line-coffee-thing-past/story?id=33948135
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Rankin, J. K. a. J., 2014. Greggs a manger aims for healthier, cheaper food-on-the-go. [Online]
Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jul/30/greggs-profits-surge-coffee
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Reuben, W., 2016. COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF GREGGS AND JD WETHERSPOON PLC, London: Academia.

Schönberger, D. I. T., 2019. Global Supply Chain and Operations Management. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.

Scott A. Snell, A. L., 2017. Starbucks: Schultz Back in the Brew, Virginia: Darden Business Publishing Cases.

Shultz, H., 1997. Pour Your Heart Into It: How Starbucks Built a Company One Cup at a Time, New York: Hyperion.

Starbucks, 2019. Shepherds Bush - Uxbridge Road. [Online]
Available at: https://www.starbucks.com/store-locator/store/2411/shepherds-bush-uxbridge-road-62-uxbridge-road-london-eng-w-12-8-lp-gb
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Thomas E. Johnsen, M. H. J. M., 2018. Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Tsanos, C. a. Z. K., 2016. The effects of behavioural supply chain relationship antecedents on integration and performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 21(6), pp. 678-693.

Volk, H. L. L. D. J. M. M., 2017. Building a Sustainable Supply Chain. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science , 98(5), pp. 391-405.

Yell, 2019. Greggs. [Online]
Available at: https://www.yell.com/biz/greggs-london-3281790/
[Accessed 26 December 2019].

Yu, Q., 2019. Supply chain management of new coffee retail enterprises from the perspective of value co-creation—Taking Laibei coffee as an example. Paris, Atlantis Press.

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT: STARBUCKS AND GREGG'S IN UK

Market Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning Red Bull, Uber, Amazon Prime

Financial Accounting Sample UAE